The fifth release of the Cambridge Digital Library includes eight new descriptions of Sanskrit manuscripts.
In this release, the cataloguing of the Mīmāṃsā manuscripts continues with three new descriptions (Add.1034, Add.1714 and Add.2485). Two of these manuscripts are particularly important. Add.1034 is a fairly old, but very well preserved manuscript of Someśvara’s Nyāyasudhā commentary on the “section on Smṛti” (smṛtipāda) of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa’s Tantravārttika (1.3), dealing with the authority of non-Vedic Scriptures and focusing most of the Mīmāṃsaka polemics with rival religious traditions (Buddhism, Jainism, etc.). This important text was edited only once in 1901-02 on a very limited manuscript basis, and was hardly studied ever since. Add.2485 is one of the few manuscripts available worldwide of Ananta Bhaṭṭa’s Mīmāṃsārahasya (17th century?), an unpublished “Garland of Chapters” (adhikaraṇamāla) by the son of the famous Mīmāṃsaka and Dharmaśāstrin Dādu Bhaṭṭa, active in the beginning of the 17th century. The manuscript, which unfortunately covers only the first two adhyāyas of the Mīmāṃsāsūtras, also has abundant annotations, and constitutes in itself an important document for the history of the late exegetical school.
Add. 1714 “is a manuscript of the Nyāyasudhā (sometimes named Rāṇaka), one of the most important commentaries on Kumārila Bhaṭṭa’s Tantravārttika. The author, Someśvara Bhaṭṭa, son of Mādhava Bhaṭṭa, might have lived in the 12th century (Mishra 1964: 42, Verpoorten 1987: 38). The manuscript covers the whole of the second chapter (pāda) of the third book (adhyāya) of the Mīmāṃsāsūtras. […] Important parts of the text are missing, especially towards the end of the manuscript, which looks globally inaccurate”. However, this manuscript proves to be interesting from another viewpoint, since it was most probably part of a collection of manuscripts commissioned by Ralph T. H. Griffith of the Benares Sanskrit College on behalf of Prof. Edward Byles Cowell. It shares many common features with Add.1709, Add.1710 and Add.1711 (script, paper and layout are identical, and a catch number has been added also on the first folio of the present manuscript), and thanks to this fact the date of its production can be narrowed to 1873-78.
This release is enriched by the descriptions of three manuscripts of the Śivadharma corpus, Add.1599, Add.1694.1 and Add.2102. The CUL collections hold six manuscripts of texts belonging to this corpus, “whose earlier works possibly originated around the 6th century, and which usually contains from six to eight texts and deals with religious practices and doctrinal issues of the lay śaiva community”. Add.1599 is a paper manuscript from Bengal, dated to the 17th century. It contains only the Śivadharmaśāstra and the Śivadharmottara, the two earliest texts of the corpus, and is “one of the very few instances of the presence of this text in Bengal”. Add.1694.1 is a palm-leaf manuscript of a clearly early date (possibly 12th century). It is a composite manuscript consisting of two codicological units. The kernel (241 folios, with a continuous foliation) was originally arranged to form a complete corpus of eight texts (Śivadharmaśāstra, Śivadharmottara, Yogasārastava, Śivadharmasaṃgraha, Umāmaheśvarasaṃvāda, Vṛṣasārasaṃgraha, Uttarottaramahāsaṃvāda, Dharma-putrikā). The second codicological unit consists of 17 folios (foliated 126-142) containing the Śivopaniṣad (a text included, for instance, in the other manuscripts of the corpus like Add.1645 and Add.2102). Add.2102 is another palm-leaf manuscript from the 12th century. Unfortunately, the beginning and the end are lost, and now it contains only six texts, some with several significant lacunae (Śivadharmottara, Śivadharmasaṃgraha, Umāmaheśvarasaṃvāda, Śivopaniṣad, Vṛṣasārasaṃgraha and Dharmaputrikā).However, it is very likely that originally it contained seven texts, since the lacuna of 50 folios at the beginning roughly corresponds to the whole text of the Śivadharmaśāstra (for instance, the text of the Śivadharmaśāstra in Add.1694.1 covers 41 folios). The loss of an entire text in a manuscript of this corpus is easily explained, for the different parts of the corpus are often separated by leaving the verso of the last leaf of a text blank, and by beginning the following text in the corpus on the verso of a new leaf. Thus, each text could be easily removed from the manuscript, and put back after the reading—but unfortunately, one reader forgot to do it for this manuscript!
For the fans of kāvya, we included the description of a manuscript belonging to the Bendall collection, Add. 2266, a finely written Jain manuscript of Kālidāsa’s Kumārasaṃbhava, dated 1668 CE.
Last but not least, in this release we included the first description of a manuscript from the CUL collection of South Indian manuscripts. Or. 2338 belongs to a set of manuscripts in Grantha script acquired by the CUL from the book dealer Robert E. Stolper in 1990-1. It is a modern multi-text manuscript containing the first two sargas of the Sarvaṃkaṣā, Mallinātha‘s commentary on Māgha’s Śiśupālavadha, and a part of “the Āśaucanirṇaya by Veṅkaṭanātha, a treatise (nibandha) on impurities and on the rituals that should be performed to remove them”.